The Cold War Against America

Of the wars being fought throughout the world today, the future of the United States depends upon the outcome of three battles. And while progress is being made in both Afghanistan and Iraq, the third front is even more dangerous – the Democratic Party’s Cold War against America.

Among recently discovered documents, university scholars have uncovered a blueprint that clearly states how this domestic war is being fought. Written in 1945 by former US Supreme Court Justice Tom Clark (1899-1977), it provides the strategy with which to defeat America from within.

***
TOP SECRET

Date: November 27, 1945

To: POTUS

From: AttyGen T. Clark

Re: Proposal for a Post-War Democratic Plan

Dear Mr. President:

Now that the United States Armed Forces have overcome the external threats posed by our German and Japanese enemies, I’ve been asked to outline a strategy for maintaining Democratic Party control over the US populace in the post-war.

The DNC is fortunate to have maintained control of the House, Senate, and presidency throughout the war, for had the GOP been in control they would likely exploit their position as well. For this reason, I’ve been asked to produce this outline.

I. MEDIA CONTROL

1. After discussing various matters with sympathetic news editors and publishers, it’s clear that they understand and sympathize with our goals and agree that control of the media is vital for maintaining control over both our US citizenry and foreign allies.

2. These publishers (Media Group) boast a combined domestic readership of approximately 23 million each day. Another 12 million listen to radio and millions more patronize movie theaters where newsreels provide public information. These numbers are expected to grow as our population and GIs return home to raise families and enter a time of peace.
3. Democratic control of information will be vital in the coming decades. In return, the aforementioned publishers expect to gain the necessary cooperation to scoop stories over less-cooperative editors who still hold quaint notions of being an “incorruptible voice for the people” or other nonsense. With this understanding, the DNC and the Media Group will likely marginalize uncooperative competitors to a point of ineffectiveness and financial failure. The Group assures us that this can be accomplished discreetly and without any overt promulgation of written or otherwise transmitted directives.
4. Friendly reporters will be promoted as their more independent, unreliable, or otherwise unsuitable peers are marginalized and terminated. Reporters who excel will eventually assume editorial positions and can be carefully monitored and cultivated by publishers in The Group. After two decades, The Group believes that unsuitable reporters will have been purged entirely.

II. EDUCATION

1. After speaking with the Education Group, we are assured that control of school curriculum is vital for developing appeal of the Democratic Party to young voters. After decades of reliance on the KKK and other reckless and embarrassing mobs to secure votes at the ballot box, the DNC must develop a friendlier strategy if we are to encourage voters to choose Democratic candidates. For example, if history books and teachers irresponsibly described the conduct and history of the Democratic Party and their treatment of blacks, Chinese, and other lesser non-whites and women, it could harm our chances to maintain a strong position on moral, social, and cultural issues at the voting booth.
2. Actual misrepresentations should not be made, for questions might arise from some outspoken historians. Rather than changing uncontrolled materials that implicate former and current Democrats, publishers can omit certain periods and acts in a way that grade school graduates and their parents are unlikely to notice. By the time they establish their own careers, the Media Group will be able to re-enforce earlier studies with newsprint and radio.
3. Public schools should be carefully and gradually degraded so that the majority of children will be unprepared to enter college or seek white collar jobs. We’ve met with union officials (Union Group) who believe that they can accomplish this through careful hiring rather than administratively asking teachers to modify curriculum. The Union Group believes that by securing pay, tenure, and other benefits above their non-union peers, they can appoint malleable educators and administrators and establish multi-million dollar bureaucracies that can transfer large tax revenues through union coffers directly toward Democratic candidates.
4. The benefits are multifold in that the Union Group not only secures Democrat legislators but also delivers marginally educated school graduates into other higher-paying union jobs over non-union jobs. By using union strikes and other bargaining mechanisms to secure pay and benefits, the Union Group can coerce corporate concessions to raise prices, union income, and union dues in the name of fairness, equity, or other monikers the DNC chooses to promote.

III. ACADEMICS

1. After careful discussions with presidents and senior administrators of numerous public and private universities, it appears unfeasible to proceed as directly on college campuses. At the onset, we were concerned that any action against “academic freedoms” would be met with resistance. After much consideration however, we believe that union and DNC contributions will eventually produce the controls we seek. Once college presidents see the financial writing on the walls and witness more cooperative universities and colleges receive funding and assistance, they will eventually replace tenured professors with more suitable candidates.
2. The same conditions apply to the legal profession as well. As a career lawyer, judge, and soon-to-be US Supreme Court justice, I appreciate the appeal of representing the poor, downtrodden, and underprivileged who will come largely from public schools, union ranks, and various lesser groups that can sustain a legal industry and judicial power necessary to generate income from corporate lawsuits and settlements. Like unions, our many trial lawyer associations can generate significant returns to be targeted toward Democratic elections and candidates. One positive consequence is that uneducated union workers are more likely to render favorably verdicts than educated and successful professionals.

IV. SUMMARY

A comprehensive report is forthcoming. This note outlines the larger report that I expect will satisfy all of your questions. This plan offers the elegance of simplicity that, once started, will not require detailed guidelines or roadmaps. Once it is implemented, I urge you to destroy this synopsis and all copies and references of my formal report. No other copies have been generated.

If properly managed, the symbiotic relationship between the Unions, Media, and Legal Groups and the Democratic Party can secure Party appeal and control for generations to come. With market forces and technologies like the development of the cathode ray tube (Tele-Vision), it’s unlikely that the Democratic Party can lose control over the US population without the miraculous development of unforeseen inventions and applications. In this way, the DNC can apply natural market forces to secure our moral and political position without the primitive means still used by some Democrat segregationists in the South. In this way, the Democratic Party can wear the clothing of reform and virtue while assuring Party control for generations to come.

As your close friend and newest Supreme Court appointee, I urge you to proceed with this plan at once. I will be honored to give the word.


Respectfully,
Thomas C. Clark
--------------------------------------

This document accurately describes conditions in America today. As public schools waste billions of dollars to expel illiterate and uneducated union laborers, the unions that protect marginal teachers and their students strong-arm corporations and consumers; and direct millions of dollars in union dues toward Democratic candidates. Trial lawyers extort billions of dollars in gratuitous lawsuits while the legislators who enjoy trial lawyer and union support block reform.

The media, academia, and unions that indoctrinate and enforce the Democratic Party line has become the greatest threat to democracy America has ever faced. While it’s easy to loathe America’s transcontinental villains, it’s harder to bite the hand that feeds and clothes a union worker’s family. And regardless of this document's existence, the success of their plan is undeniable.

The Democratic Party has painted Americans into a corner not unlike the cul-de-sac that social policies have created in Europe. One cannot imagine our national ignorance of Europe’s prima facie failures, nor America’s media, academic, and union-driven refusal to accept the obvious.

To maintain the control that America’s corporations and military threaten to wrest from THE LEFT, the Democratic Party flirts with treason to sabotage the underpinnings of our country. What shocks our consciousness isn’t the contents of the Clark Document, but the devastating accuracy of its imaginary authenticity.

Had Thomas Clark actually published such a memo in 1945, he and his co-conspirators would have been hung before one could say Ethel and Julius Rosenberg. That the results of the letter are perpetuated by unions, educators, and the DNC today deserves at least the same fate.