Tuesday, May 31, 2005

EVISCERATE & PATRIOT (Defined)

e·vis·cer·ate; verb.

1. To remove the entrails of; disembowel.
2. To take away a vital or essential part of: a compromise that eviscerated the proposed bill.
3. To remove the contents of (an organ).
4. To remove an organ, such as an eye, from (a patient).

Eviscerate is what Saddam, Hitler, Amin, Stahlin, and Pol Pot did to millions of their own people.
Eviscerate is what patriots are trying to end in Darfur, Iraq, and Afghanistan.
Eviscerate is what liberals around the world suffer when they defend dictators like the aforementioned.

Eviscerate is what I do to liberal rationale when they oppose our efforts to assist in the aforementioned countries.
Eviscerate is what a liberals feel when their propaganda is questioned.
Eviscerate is what liberals do to their reputation when they attack individuals instead of their ideas.


pa·tri·ot; noun.

One who loves, supports, and defends one's country.

When liberals try to make Americans believe that the Tokyo Roses and Al Jezeeras of America are patriotic, I will eviscerate their propaganda. I do this because I am a patriot.

Honesty in Journalism

A friend of mine sent an essay by journalist Frank Schaeffer, who writes about the difference between journalists who have sons and daughters in the military, and those who do not. The Military You Don't See is an essay by someone who does.

My son left for college this week to enlist in the Marine Corps - almost 30 years to the day that my own enlistment began. I recently met with Marines from Charlie Company 1/7 who will soon return to Iraq. And unlike the war-mongering stereotypes that the left perpetuates, no one cherishes peace more than members of our military.


Monday, May 30, 2005

Friends

Anonymous wrote this of my conversation with my journalist-friend:

Your evisceration of your so called "oldest and dearest friend" reveals much about your character... it means nothing to you or your President to destroy relationships that have taken years to nurture. Just as the U.S. has isolated itself in world that increasingly despises it, you will become further isolated in your life...

Dear Anonymous:

Thank you for writing. Although I cherish my relationships old and new, none of my friendships matter more than 1) my planet and, 2) my country (in that order). People sometimes forget that our personal relationships depend on America's vitality as much as the international community does. And while France and Russia might gain a momentary economic or political advantage by undermining our global efforts; in the long run, our failures are theirs’.

Our mistakes notwithstanding, our overall history demonstrates our intentions and commitment to our global neighbors. If not for the US, much of our planet would still be enslaved or imprisoned. That diplomats can be bribed by a corrupt dictator disturbs me more than whether they say they like me or not. Our international partnerships should be based on something more akin to marriage than sex – and we should never rely on prostitutes to sustain our national self-esteem.

It takes courage and stamina to examine policy so that we can make intelligent decisions in the voting booth. Free societies depend on uncorrupted journalists to help them make informed decisions. Corrupt or biased journalists can cause far more damage than any brutal cop with a nightstick. When we ignore bad behavior, especially among our family, friends, and neighbors, then we become accessories to their acts of commission or omission. And because the media is now a commodity, voters rely more and more on shareholders to decide what gets printed. As we the people abdicate our responsibility to question what we hear and read, we tend to apply our votes toward shareholder choices.

My responsibility to my country and my neighbors is far more important than played-out friendships. If my friend robs you or dumps his trash in your yard, my friendly silence does nothing to make your world better. Because my friends value integrity over civility, they love me all the more. Loneliness is not something I worry about.

Viagra - Epilogue

Readers who’ve followed my Viagra posts may suspect that my environmentalist friend is over the top by now. Notice how this professional journalist never addresses any content of the issues I raised. Once again, his comments are bold and mine are blue.

*************

You (F-word) (A-word)! Leave my parents out of this! (It just shows how desperate you are to prove yourself right!)

I never called your parents or mentioned your association with this dialogue. Your dad called to say hello and your name never came up. Many people read my blog and you're not the only person I’ve known for 43 years. You are as anonymous as your reaction.

And how dare you post a private conversation of ours on the Internet!

Yeah, that's much worse that falsely calling someone a liar without backing up your claims, isn't it? Had I posted your personal information you would have reason to complain. You cannot be as offended by our conversation as you are embarrassed by your intellectual laziness, are you? You were the one who called Ann Coulter a liar and I’m the one waiting for an example that supports your attack. Your rage is predictable. You’re only upset because I gave you an opportunity for self-expression and you expressed yourself.

In hindsight, it's clear to me how you could have evolved into such a complete Fascist.

Unless I'm mistaken, fascism was used to spread National Socialism (not democracy) through violence and ruthlessness. The last time I checked, socialism was something that our Democratic Party and groups like ELF seem to embrace. Also, free expression and free press are anathema to Fascists, which might explain your apoplectic response. Oh wait… This isn’t another one of your jokes, is it? You’re such a kidder!

Our friendship should have ended a long time ago. It is finished now! You are officially on my junk sender list because that is what your messages are worth!

Oh no – not that! I’m so sorry! I was so stupid! I learned my lesson today: that good liberal democrats don’t question each other’s belief systems.

So let me ask you this, my friend, if I return to the Democratic Party, remove all of my posts, start hugging owls and post expressions of hatred toward my country, my President, and that dangerous woman, Ann Coulter, can we be friends again? If not, I don’t know what I’ll do. After all, there are only eleven million people in Los Angeles County.

Yes, gone are the halcyon days when people like you could simply hang people like me and burn books you didn’t like. Gone are the days when Walter Cronkite said, “That’s the way it is,” and we believed him.


And although you’ve blocked my email, I won't close you off or censor you. You're also free to comment on any of my posts: But be careful, the folks who read our comments judge us by the content of our commentary, not our wallpaper. I wish you well.

Sunday, May 29, 2005

More on Viagra

If you read yesterday's Blinded by Viagra column, you probably expected my journalist friend to respond. He did. I've posted our complete dialogue - my responses are in blue:

**************************

I'm sorry you evidently missed the attempt at humor in my previous message. It was far from rage. Which side of rage were you on? Evidently, you take yourself quite seriously these days I take my WRITING as seriously as you do – unless writing is just a job for you? and didn't get the difference. There’s the condescension that inspired me yesterday. At least you’re consistent.

Like all good liberals, you belittle the individual when coherence escapes you. If writers aren't expected to take their ideas seriously, what’s the point of writing? In the context of your initial response, was your comment that "this country is in deep trouble" also part of your joke? Definitions of outrage notwithstanding, your response was inspirational.

If you're saying I'm intolerant of people like Ann Coulter who knowingly lie... Give me ONE EXAMPLE of an Ann Coulter lie… have made an absolutely mockery of everything I was taught about professional journalism, and actively seek to defame other people (a.k.a., liberals or anyone else who disagrees with them) then I guess I plead guilty. Like cops, Ann relies on evidence. If Ann lied, conservatives would drop her faster than Michael Jackson could drop a boyfriend who turns 14. But you're right, Ann Coulter has a much different ethic than the "trusted professional journalists" at Newsweek, See-BS, or the Times (pick one). Opinions are only as good as the evidence that supports it.

If it makes you feel better, I also don't think much of Al Franken or Bill Moyers, for the same reasons. I’m glad you made the distinction. At least Ann didn’t have to convince a court that she writes “joke books” to escape libel suits. You did, however, forget to mention the ENTIRE DEMOCRATIC PARTY’S defense of Bill Clinton, who admittedly perjured himself in federal court, paid a fine, and had his law license suspended for five years. Leave it to Democrats to think felons are fit to hold office AND vote. As bad as Richard Nixon was, at least he had the grace to remove himself from office without asking Americans to define the word IS. And those are just our domestic liars. How about the UN (can you say, Food for Oil?) diplomats that Saddam bribed (at the expense of his own people) to parrot everything John Kerry said about the wrongfulness of our actions in Iraq – that is until he changed his mind. Many liberals still insist that Arabs are incapable of governing themselves by democracy. Talk about condecending...

One thing is clear: We can't be Democrats without playing loose with concepts of veracity and integrity. That journalists like Michael Moore are honored guests at Democratic conventions speaks volumes. So, my friend, I've offered a few examples of what lying really is – give me ONE of Ann Coulter’s – or was that a joke too?

However, I didn't say anywhere that I don't think they have a right to say what they do, as you imply; I sent one picture in one email and you waxed hysterical…

...as a sign of respect for our friendship, I simply asked you not to send me political emails, much as I do not send you emails I get about impeaching Bush, or how he should be tried for war crimes. I didn't know that a photograph of Ann and me was disrespectful.

For the record, I live in Hollywood. I read the NY and LA Times, and articles from around the world. I rely on liberal viewpoints to understand my own. It’s what journalists do. Do you think we should suspend the vigorous exchange of ideas to save our quaint friendship? Life’s too short; and like you said, "this country is in deep trouble." Like Pieter Bruegel’s soldier in Triumph of Death, I've seen what’s coming.

There's a big difference there, bud, which evidently you missed entirely by implying that "people like me" are fascists -- a charge that can be leveled at both extremes of the political spectrum, I'd say. Agreed - ELF is certainly as menacing as schoolyard prayer groups. Say, isn’t ELF an environmentalist organization?

But seriously, the difference between right-wing extremism and left-wing extremism is like the difference between pedophilia and Catholic priest pedophiles: the latter are abetted by a large bureaucratic organization that preys on its own flock while preaching love, respect, tolerance, and compassion. Although you'd like to believe it, Conservatives don’t support anything more dangerous than oppressed people and manger scenes. Conservatives are generally allergic to felons, which may be why Democrats recruit them.

By the way, since you further crossed the line from political to personal, by implying that my own life may not be going as I'd hoped, my life is going fine. I was only trying to make sense of your intolerance. It was speculation. It wasn’t even a joke. I may not be living in Beverly Hills, but I wake up every morning knowing that I am using what resources I have to at least try to make the world a better place -- not just for my family but for everyone. You might tag comments like this as joke or personal attack (I have trouble with nuance).

As you know, I’ve been in service of community and country long enough to understand the comparative nature of our sacrifice to God, Country, and Humanity. And while I value the rain forest and Alaskan wilderness as much as you do (but not enough to commit felonies), I know that we cannot save the spotted owl unless we understand and save ourselves (the global our, not the my-block our). Regardless of whether the owls and salamanders survive, it is ultimately Humanity’s future that is at stake.


If we exterminated everything between plankton and ourselves tomorrow, this blue pebble will eventually cleanse itself of our folly to create species that will thrive long after the decay of our most sophisticated bomb. We can only hope that they will evolve into something better than ourselves.

Saturday, May 28, 2005

Blinded by Viagra

With this weekend’s news reports that Viagra causes blindness, my faith in parental veracity has eroded even further. My parents used to say that the only way I could blind myself was if I poked my eye out with a stick or tried to sate my sexual urges with self-abuse. Blinded by faith, I avoided everything shaped like a stick and rarely glanced at my private parts until I turned 30-something. And now I learn that Viagra can blind me as surely as a long stick!

I haven’t been this disillusioned since discovering that all those emails and phone calls from lonely wives were designed to get me to send money to the Romanian Mafia. I now spend my disability checks on group therapy where I share how I was betrayed by Candace, Velvet, Georgia, Svetlana, and Sister Taneesha – whose own personal struggle with convent life was so difficult that her voice was beginning to sound like Dennis Rodman’s. When I asked her why a nun would identify herself a lonely wife, she answered that she was "married to Jesus" (Jee-zus, not Hay-soose). How could I have been so wrong! My therapist says that I should put my thoughts into writing to help me cope, which is why I’m writing these… wait – I’m getting a call.

I’m back. What I liked about Viagra was that my liberal girlfriends used to think I was aroused, despite their green teeth, hairy armpits, and bikini lines that resembled Chewbacca. I’d pop a few of those baby blues and I was up for romance no matter what kind of alien sounds they made. Viagra doesn’t require the kind of intimate honesty that makes traditional marriages work, which is probably why President Clinton prescribed it to millions of prison inmates. Our incarcerated brothers know that Republicans never would’ve hooked them up they way we did – which gives felons one more reason to vote for Hillary in 2008.

I think the toughest thing about being a liberal is that we can’t question anything our liberal friends or leadership says without being called a right-wing-whacko-Christian-such-and-so. I’m not that stupid you know. I got A's in college, unlike the handful of racists and house-Negroes in class who questioned our professors all the time. Those Republicans, numbed by talk radio, never got it. They were soooooo tedious. But I was a lot smarter than they were: When they started their rants I’d shut them up by saying, "you wouldn’t understand." They were so easy.

But now as I get older, I’m starting to question a lifetime of truths. And while I still don’t want to engage the racists and house-negroes of the Republican Party, I also don’t want to offend any of my remaining friends with questions that might sound, er, Republican.

I risked it anyway. A couple of days ago I sent a note to my oldest and dearest friend – a guy I’ve known since our first day of kindergarten 43 years ago. Although he’s not gay or Native American, his politics are otherwise unimpeachable: Not only does he have an Ecosystems Degree from UCLA and a Master’s Degree from the School of Journalism at Columbia, Missouri, he also writes and manages fundraising for some kind of Save the Featherless Spotted Salamander Society, which is almost as good as being a gay Native American. In a reply that came faster than Michael Jackson at a sleepover, my now ex-friend said I sounded like a racist conservative and that we could no longer talk politics because I wouldn’t understand.

With our lifelong friendship now severed, I was crushed. How could I have been so wrong? If I’d only kept my stupid comments to myself, we’d still be good friends. Instead, I’m sitting here lonely and confused as he sanitizes his computer for any sign of ever having been connected to the same Internet that I use.

My self-esteem was so shattered that Commander Montgomery Scott wormholed his way from the future to tell me how worthless I was. He was right - first betrayed by my harem of lonely wives, I was now rejected by my best friend.

But just as Scotty returned to the future, a bright flash jolted me from the depths of my despair with another dangerously conservative discovery - Viagra is the pharmaceutical form of liberalism!

Think about it. Like a Michael Moore documentary, Viagra delivers the look and feel of the real thing without the need for intellectual or spiritual honesty that true love (or a documentary) demands. And now that doctors have warned consumers that the drug can cause blindness, Viagra becomes an ideal metaphor of the Democratic Party.

I have much to think about. Now that my Viagra-inflated self-esteem lies shattered on the floor, I can choose to sweep it up - or sweep it away to make room for a new friends and ideas. The conversion from liberal to conservative is a lonely endeavor unsuitable for the feint of heart.

Later that night, I dozed off and revisited my long telephonic walks on the beach with Sister Taneesha. She seemed so pure and real that it wouldn't have mattered if she really was Dennis Rodman. I awoke quickly, thankful for my return to reality.

Thursday, May 26, 2005

Why Bigots Love Hate-Crime Laws

Two brothers were attacked and beaten by a gang in Compton yesterday. Deputies arrested seven suspects. The victims survived.

For most Americans, communities like Compton are as alien as a Star Wars landscape. Each day, news vans descend into these hostile environments to disgorge hairballs into the street. These Bob Woodward wannabes come to life with the probity of a quinceaƱera before donning their sad masks for the camera. When the reporter’s furrowed brows start to cramp, she wraps the story, cuts the lights, and returns to her idling shuttlecraft. Someone murmurs, “I’m glad that’s over,” and those within earshot wonder if it was the reporter, the cop, or the deceased who made the remark. One story closer to the anchor desk, she will revisit this alien world tomorrow; not because she cares, but because the media’s shareholders must pretend they do.

Because of the staggering volume of assaults and murders that occur throughout LA County each year, reporters look for anomalies to attract viewers. What made yesterdays’ story unique wasn’t that a dozen blacks attacked two white brothers, but that epithets usually reserved for award-winning rap musicians and public school children were uttered as these gang members pummeled their victims. And although no one was shocked by the assault or language, their comments were used to enhance the bail far beyond what garden variety sociopaths usually post after ravaging their victims. Had these African American criminals donned hoods and hung a black child from a tree by the neck, their bail might have been much lower.

Welcome to the absurdity of hate-crime legislation. Designed to protect one group of bigots from another, the Local Law Enforcement Enhancement Act (LLEEA) is not unlike every other redundant knee-jerk law that defaces our penal code. Like the federal law that guarantees Viagra to prison inmates, this one perpetuates the social diseases it was intended to cure. And like every other liberal policy since the New Deal, its existence insults social progress by quantifying the merits of one person’s murder over another, based exclusively upon a person’s affiliation, race, or speech.

The scope of its impertinence is breathtaking. Its most fundamental flaw is that it presumes that racial hatred is a predominantly heterosexual male white Christian pathology. Liberals, from university professors to pseudo-reverends, showcase every white-on-black anecdote they can find, even though they know that blacks are sixty times more likely to victimize whites (AND blacks) than whites do against blacks. And because of the way LLEEA categorizes victims, the statistics generated become meaningless. If applied to beagles, the scam works like this: The FBI tracks beagle dog bites across the US for five years while excluding dobermans and pit bulls. In this way, statistics will prove that beagles are far more dangerous than all other canines tracked in the survey.

Another problem with LLEEA is that illiterate bigoted white male Christian heterosexual mutes who murder after their hate group affiliation has lapsed can expect less prison time than their chattier white male counterparts.

Hate crime legislation also implies that murderers who don't use the N-word are morally superior to murderers who do. Whites who use the N-word during attacks against blacks would be charged, while blacks who use it during attacks against other blacks would not. The jury is still out on whether Koreans who use the N-word while assaulting dark-skinned Latvian-Americans can be charged with hate crimes. Then there's the question of how dark the Latvian must be before considered for protected status.

I’ve seen gunshot wounds and dead children. I know what mayhem looks like. Before hate crime legislation usurped sobriety, whenever one person intentionally inflicted injury upon another, the motive of hatred did not require further categorization. And while it’s important for social scientists to understand hatred’s genesis and propagation to promote humanity’s social evolution, its legislation quantifies and categorizes hatred in ways that imply that one person’s murder is somehow better than another’s. This devolves crimes against persons into a pecking order that grades the murder of white mothers of infant children below that of non-white mothers of infant children. That this legislation requires jurists to feel differently about one drive-by shooting over another betrays all liberal notions of compassion.

For the media, mayhem and murder engage their consumers’ most primitive interests. As uncomplicated as two minutes of porn, the story Joe Kills Sam doesn’t risk a turned page or changed channel the way that stories about how Corrupt Politicians, Cardinals, Judges, Lawyers, and the Press Conspire to Defraud Taxpayers can. And while we spend billions on school systems that graduate the illiterate student-survivors of campus race riots, we are somehow expected to feel better when a drive-by shooting only involves blacks.

Tuesday, May 24, 2005

Why I Voted for Antonio Villaraigoza

Escorted by a phalanx of battle-hardened Marines from the Seventh Regiment, Ann Coulter descended into the liberal ground-zero of Hollywood as Craig Ferguson’s headliner at CBS’ Late Late Show, followed by a Republican celebration at Level One. Seemingly possessed by the spirits of Dolly Madison and George Patton, the glamorous Ms. Coulter spent the evening spreading cheer and liberal barbs like coffee and doughnuts to cops on a cold night. The slinky black dress didn’t hurt either. I haven’t been this mesmerized since leaving Miss Folmer’s 2nd grade classroom.

As the evening progressed, some asked me how a retired LA cop could favor the former head of MECHA and the ACLU over the career prosecutor and incumbent, Mayor Jim Hahn.

Those who’ve read my earlier posts know that my final decision rested on whether I preferred to lose my home to Ken Lay over having it torched during a home invasion robbery. Since the outcome was the same, I opted for a quick delivery from evil.

It takes a lot more than fraud to insult LA’s liberals. Every time I think someone from LA’s political landscape (remember the Star Wars bar scene?) has finally done something that offends even liberals, they rally to exonerate the accused before eloping with their livestock.

When faced with these choices, I voted for Antonio Villaraigoza. If we are lucky, he'll be the disaster that even liberals will not defend.

CB

Saturday, May 21, 2005

Stephen Elliott, Alonza Thomas, and other Liberals

Stephen Elliott penned a story today about Alonza Thomas, a hapless gang member who got tackled and arrested after sticking a loaded handgun in a clerk’s chest while demanding money. Essays like these litter the mainstream media where editors assume that Americans are too stupid to question.

I've quoted Mr. Elliot’s essay in black italics and my response in blue.

CB
*******

Mr. Elliott writes:

Welcome To The Gang Violence and Juvenile Crime Prevention Act

…a fifteen-year-old boy named Alonza Thomas walks into a convenience store wearing a bandana over his mouth and nose. He's carrying a gun. He places the gun against the clerk's chest and demands money. Another clerk tackles the boy and a struggle ensues in which the gun is fired leaving a tidy hole in the store rooftop. Plaster and dust sprinkles on the combatants while the boy is subdued.Here are the facts: It is the boy's first crime. His record is as clean as an upscale restaurant. He is alone. No one was hurt…

Lee Malvo had a clean record when he murdered his tenth victim. Mr. Elliott assumes that this is Alonza’s first criminal act. Let's consider that Alonza carried a concealed and loaded firearm to a convenience store. The gun wasn’t his and it’s doubtful that the owner gave him permission to use it. Alonza entered the convenience store with the intent to commit a theft or a felony, which is a burglary. Both of these crimes occurred before Alonza pushed the loaded handgun into the clerk’s chest demanding cash. Figuratively speaking, Alonza was a third-striker before his first arrest.

Alonza’s sophistication and sentence supports the likelihood of criminal affiliation or gang membership. Mr. Elliott confuses the absence of a recorded criminal record with what he assumes is a first-time criminal act. The last time I checked with the FBI, the typical street criminal like Alonza commits eighty (80) crimes between arrests. So if Alonza was only an average criminal, he likely committed dozens of crimes in the months leading up to this first arrest. The FBI statistics I cite are consistent with my twenty-year experience on the streets of LA. Children caught committing their first crimes don’t rob clerks with loaded handguns, but slowly work their way from petty theft, vandalism, and assault. I’m not a betting man, but I’d bet Mr. Elliott my professional licenses that this robbery wasn’t the first crime little Alonza committed.

Alonza pleads guilty to second degree robbery, admits to a personal firearm use violation, petitions for a remand to juvenile court. But there is a problem. The laws have been changed. March 2000 is an off-election. The voters of California have just passed the Gang Violence and Juvenile Crime Prevention Act of 1998, AKA - Proposition 21.

Mr. Elliott only alludes to Alonza’s gang membership. Most gangs require members to commit crimes as a condition of membership. Mara Salvatrucha (MS), for example, requires a verifiable murder to join. Elliott proceeds to educate his readers with facts (ala the LA Times, NY Times, and See-BS does):

Quick education. Proposition 21 has two primary extensions. The first takes crimes where the presumption was that a child would be tried as an adult and removes the discretion of the prosecutor and the court, mandating the youth enter into the adult correctional system. The second, and here is where Alonza Thomas comes in, takes crimes committed by juveniles where the child could be tried as an adult but the presumption is that they would be tried as children, because they are children, because as a society we know what a child is, we know the difference between a child and an adult and the potential of youth, it takes these cases and allows the prosecutor to file the case in adult court, if the prosecutor so desires. And this is what happens to Alonza Thomas.

While Elliott might know the legal and Leave it to Beaver definitions of what children are, he ignores why two-thirds of (liberal) Californians passed the act – that we’re tired of children like Alonza victimizing others. Until the act was passed, children like Alonza committed crimes because they gangs they worked for knew the courts were soft on juvenile offenders – which is precisely why voters removed discretion from lawyers and judges who are permitted to carry concealed guns and live in gated communities the way their minions wish they could.

Mr. Elliott has no concept of what children are. Children are what my children and friends were until they graduated high school. None of them toted guns or threatened shopkeepers with murder. The first American killed in Afghanistan was killed by a 14-year-old. Lee Malvo was 17 when he was arrested for killing ten people. Children account for 14% of all murder arrests, and 17% of all violent crime arrests. (OJJDP, Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 1999 National Report). Elliott might have an easier time adopting one or two of these children than he has writing compelling arguments.

It's really not so complicated. A fifteen-year-old boy sets off to commit his first crime… He's a bumbling criminal… Where are his friends? There is evidence of psychological trauma, but isn't there always?

Elliott implies that because "psychological trauma" always exists, society cannot hold sociopaths responsible - making society's victims the real suspects and deserving of what they get.

Who is this young Jesse James and where did he get his gun? Who cares?

It's too bad Alonza refused to tell the officers who arrested him. Why would someone as innocent as Alonza refuse to cooperate with police? Oh yeah, I remember, we can't trust the police or voters, can we.

The boy is sentenced to thirteen years in adult prison.

Good – it saves us time and grief.

There will be no school, no rehabilitation.

Trade schools and educational programs are available to prisoners. He wouldn’t be the first college grad who earned his degree in prison either. It’s there for the taking.

The child is thrown into a warehouse, a crowded meat locker, separate from the adult population but without access to education, gang intervention, drug programs, etc.

Let's hope he doesn't like the environment and takes advantage of his opportunities.

Not even eligible for education courses offered to adults because the child populations has to be kept separate from the adult population until they turn eighteen, at which point they are mainlined into the system. There is no doubt Alonza will come out worse then he went in. His chances were always low; now there is no chance at all.

Check your math, Elliott. Since Alonza committed this armed robbery in 2000 when he was 15, he's probably twenty today.

Alonza Thomas will spend thirteen years in adult prison for a crime in which no one was hurt.
The typical time served for manslaughter is only 18 months. Had Alonza killed the clerk as an adult in 2000 and copped a plea in 2001, he’d be back on the streets by now. It’s about time that two-thirds of our population wised up and removed children like Alonza from the streets.

The measure in this case is purely punitive.

No Elliott, punitive is something akin to prisons I’ve visited in Central America, Asia, Africa, and the Far East where societies understand that there's no greater rehabilitative mechanism than punishment. In those countries, recidivism is a tiny fraction of what it is in the US.

Supporters of the proposition talk about "the will of the people" when questioned on the sanity of putting children like Alonza in adult prisons. "That's the law that was chosen," Deputy Attorney General Kathleen McKenna was quoted in the San Francisco Chronicle, as if that somehow absolved her of responsibility, as if there was no such thing as right or wrong.

Instead of blaming the DA for democratic decisions made by two-thirds of California’s population, I invite Elliott to adopt a child like Alonza this year. A nice, 15-year-old boy with gang ties, guns, and a willingness to assault others would help Elliott figure out where his essay went wrong.

But did the people really understand the cost?

What price would Elliott have placed on the clerk had he been killed? Unless Elliott values Alonza’s freedom more than the clerk’s life, the costs are negligible.

Meanwhile, the prosecutor deranged with power…

Here we go - blame the prosecutor.

This year in April the proposition withstood its most recent challenge with a ruling by the California Supreme Court that juveniles tried as adults must be sentenced to the adult system rather than the California Youth Authority. And still we sleep at night.

Thank you, Elliott. I sleep very well.


Clark Baker
http://exlibhollywood.blogspot.com/

*****************
Stephen Elliott’s essay can be found here:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/theblog/archive/stephen-elliott/welcome-to-the-gang-viole_1360.html

His web page is here:

http://www.stephenelliott.com/

Friday, May 20, 2005

What's in a Name?

My Bio - The Elevator Version (Updated June 2009)

I was born and raised in the San Fernando Valley, California. I served in the Marine Corps from 1975-1981 and the LAPD from 1980-2000. After I wrote these Daily News essays that were critical of then-Los Angeles Mayor Tom Bradley, I was falsely accused of assaulting a jaywalker. Although the LAPD cleared me of all charges, a jury convicted me of assaulting the uninjured suspect. I was sentenced and, a few months later, fired.

I returned to the LAPD in 1994 after the judge and prosecutor were found guilty of misconduct. The original prosecutor was accused of filing more than 100 false complaints. I retired from the LAPD in 2000

In 2011, the LA Times finally admitted that retaliation has been a serious problem for decades (2).

I now work primarily as a private investigator, occasionally interrupting work to write, dive, fly, photograph, make videos, travel (to places like Thailand, Newfoundland, Prague, Kenya, and Australia) and celebrate life. I mentor political candidates, physicians, and police officers, and serve on the Board of Semmelweis Society International. I support organizations that include the RJC, AFA, and Stand With Us.

My children are now grown. Both are married – my son is now serving his second Marine Corps enlistment while my daughter teaches high school geometry.

Bio - NOT the Elevator Version

I was born in 1957, the first of Howard and Dores Baker’s two children. Our first home was located in the lower-middle class neighborhood of Pacoima, California. We moved to Reseda in 1960.

Mom

My mother was born in Porto Alegre, Brazil to a German father (Walter Gretzschel) and Brazilian/Portuguese mother (Arlinda). Still a young girl, Mom sailed to Germany with her aunt and uncle to their extended family in Berlin, remaining there until 1932 as the Nazi’s came to power. Although not Jewish, their refusal to join the Nazi Party made life difficult for them. Without party affiliation, employment and social relationships became increasingly difficult; and when Nazi thugs seriously injured one of her cousins in an assault, they returned to Brazil. They purchased passage back to Berlin in 1939 but cancelled the trip when Germany invaded Poland.

Walter moved to the Belgian Congo and remarried. Shortly after WWII began, he and his family were taken to an allied prison camp where they remained until 1948. Mom’s half-sisters Uli and Lotte grew up in the camp. They met Mom in Rio a few years later.

After graduating from secretarial school, Mom briefly worked as a secretary before becoming an airline stewardess. She met Hans Wendt, a painting contractor who asked her to move to Rio. Hans was a good man and successful entrepreneur, but overbearing and violently jealous. After several violent assaults and a failed escape attempt, Mom was too afraid to run away and had nowhere to go. With the help of Ernst Jahn (mutual friend) and step-sister Uli (from Africa), she secured her passport and tourist visa.

In the spring of 1956, Mom left with Uli and Ernst for the United States. Hans didn’t learn of their departure until they landed in Caracas.

After arriving in Miami, they bought a used car and drove north. As the heavy rains followed them north through Florida, Georgia and the Carolinas, Mom remembered that a friend had warned her of the bad weather along the East Coast compared to California. After a short conversation, they changed directions and headed west.

When they arrived in Los Angeles with no money, Ernst traded his camera for two nights at LA’s Figueroa Hotel. The next day they drove to the San Fernando Valley where Mom and Uli found work waiting tables for tips at the Casa do Brasil in Reseda.

An adventurer at heart, Ernst spent the next 15 years droving his VW bus from Canada to Tierra del Fuego, writing and publishing his Pan American Highway Guide for many years. He disappeared near Colombia during the 1970s and was not heard from again.

Dad

My father, Howard, was the second of four children born to Clark and Lucille Baker in Bryan, Ohio. Dad’s Grandfather James “Wilson” and Uncle Robert were pioneers of Ohio (1838) and Kansas (1868). Clark’s accidental death at the height of the Depression was catastrophic for Lucile and her four young children. They relied on community welfare services until Dad and his siblings were old enough to work. As the oldest boy, Dad often fished for dinner in the local ponds and Beaver Creek. On cold winter nights, the children wore paper bags in bed to stay warm.

Every month, Lucile and her children dressed up before visiting the community welfare coordinators in Montpelier. Even as a child, Dad felt deep shame as his mother struggled to show the board of how she and her children deserved ongoing public assistance.

Dad worked mostly as a farm laborer until 1946 when he joined the Army-Air Corps. He served in the US and Europe as an aircraft mechanic until the end of the Korean War. When his enlistment ended, he tinkered with his cars and worked various jobs as a mechanic. When his married sister (my Aunt Betty) invited him to visit her in the San Fernando Valley, he rented a room in Encino. Howard met Dores at the Casa Do Brasil in the spring of 1956, married, and I was born the following summer.

Growing Up
I was a happy kid, growing up with my siblings (we adopted my older brother in 1962), neighborhood friends and loving and supportive parents. When Nikita Khrushchev visited Los Angeles in 1959, his passing LAPD motorcycle escort left me with a lasting impression.

I attended public school, which I found extremely boring. I paid attention in class but rarely did homework. Except for a few, my teachers were mostly uninspiring. One standout - my 6th grade teacher, Mr. Aldrich, who had returned from a tour as a marine officer in Vietnam in 1969. He was later the commanding officer at HQ 2/23, a reserve unit where I served during the early 1980s. Albert Mayes taught me to love choral music, as did Margaret Hindee at Reseda High School. I kissed my first girlfriend, Carrie Weiss, in the 2nd grade.

I grew up hearing conflicting stories about the LAPD. Television shows like Dragnet, Adam-12, and Wambaugh novels told one side of the story while the news media’s growing infatuation with militants and hippies told another. I wasn’t sure who to believe, but I knew I wanted to make a positive difference in my community. I loathed bullies and, while watching the SLA shootout in 1974 on TV, I reaffirmed my commitment to join the LAPD.

Marine Corps

After graduating from Reseda High School in 1975, I enlisted in the Marine Corps primarily to optimize my chance of being accepted into the Police Academy. After completing infantry training school (top center), I was assigned to the 9th Marine Regiment (Weapons - E 2/9) at Camp Schwab, Okinawa. In September (1976), our battalion deployed aboard the USS Dubuque, which took us to training facilities in Japan, the Philippines, Hong Kong, and a joint training exercise with the Korean Marines in Pusan, Korea.

In February 1977, I received orders to Henderson Hall in Washington DC. I was honored to serve the remainder of my enlistment at the US Consulate General in Calcutta India and US Embassy in El Salvador with the Marine Corps’ MSG Battalion.

India

As a 19-year-old marine, I was grateful to travel, live, and work in foreign lands. My official passport was the fastest ticket through customs – no lines or waiting.

As part of the diplomatic community, I was regularly invited to many formal and informal diplomatic events.

I received one of my first invitations shortly after arriving in Calcutta in May 1977, when our Consul General hosted a reception for US Ambassador Robert Goheen. As the newest arrival, I decided to keep a low profile and stay out of the way. After filling my plate with the unfamiliar Indian cuisine, I found a remote corner of the living room couch where, within a few moments, US Ambassador Robert Goheen settled next to me!

Fearing that I’d say something dumb, I kept my comments short and polite. He soon disarmed me with his easy manner and I found myself comparing LA’s public and private schools with those I’d seen in the Far East and India. When I voiced my admiration of how well-behaved and advanced students appeared in Asia compared to the often kids I knew back home, he countered that the US public school systems were the best in the world. Having just graduated from Reseda High School, we got into a friendly dispute until he said he’d once been a school administrator. When I asked where he worked he said, “I was the President of Princeton University.”

Although I wanted to crawl under the couch at the time, my later involvement with the Los Angeles Unified School District reconfirmed my skepticism regarding the teacher unions and their disastrous influence in America’s public schools, which rank 23rd (below Thailand, and the Slovak and Czech republics).

One cannot compare the constant grind and hardship in a marine infantry company to my assignment in Calcutta. Instead of living on a base with thousands of troops, I served in a detachment of six and lived at the State Department’s very comfortable housing on Gokhale Road, still located between the Victoria Memorial and the Calcutta Club. We each had our own apartment and servants conducted the routine chores of housekeeping and meal preparation.

Shifts generally consisted of one eight-hour shift with 24 hours off for three days (Day-PM-Graveyard) before taking two days off. I soon traded my jeans for a kurta-pajama and spent many days walking throughout the city, inhaling the sights, sounds, hardships, and realities within one of the world’s most desperate cities. When I hear someone railing about poverty in America today, I think of those who would have given anything for the opportunity to live in the comparative opulence of any of America’s ugliest housing projects.

At the consulate, one never knew who would show up. One morning, two women dressed as nuns walked straight to the elevators without stopping to introduce themselves. I’d never seen them before and, reflexively, I called out.

“Hey you!”

Both turned toward me, as did the shocked receptionist. A holdover from the Crown Colony days, Mrs. Robinson scolded me in the King’s English: “That’s Mother Teresa! She can go in!”

I’d heard of Mother Teresa but had not seen a picture of her. Instead of proceeding up the elevator, Mother Teresa returned to my desk and smiled sweetly.

Hello, I’m Mother Teresa and today I would like to visit the Consul General before stopping by…”

I didn’t want to detain her but she stuck around a few moments longer as if making sure that my authority had not been bruised. When she saw me during later visits she made a point to stop and check in with me. I sensed that she was flirting – at least as much as a saint could flirt with a marine.

On another day, a big guy walked up and gripped my hand.

“Hello Corporal,” he said, “I was in the Corps too – many years ago.”

He said he’d been a marine aviator during WWII and talked briefly about his days in Asia and India. He said his name was Greg Boyington but that everyone called him Pappy. One never knew who would stop by the consulate for a chat.

I met Malati Raman a few days before my 20th birthday in 1977. A senior at Calcutta’s Presidency College, Malu’s father had worked at the Consulate until 1976, when he was suddenly stricken by a heart attack. His passing was a terrible blow to the family, who had many friends at the Consulate.

Although it was clear that she wanted nothing with me, I was hooked. We were engaged by December 1977 and, shortly after informing the Marine Corps of my desire to stay in India, I received orders to the other side of the planet. After a few days of leave in Reseda, the State Department ordered me to El Salvador.

El Salvador

Although President Carter spoke of human rights in the media, I learned that his military support was helping regional dictators murder and torture thousands throughout Central and South America. By 1978, El Salvador’s military junta was implicated in the murder, kidnapping, torture, and disappearance of more than 100 dissidents each month. This number eventually included American nuns and Archbishop Romero.

Junta death squads acted with impunity while then-Deputy Secretary of State Warren Christopher oversaw Latin American affairs. When President Carter's top State Department civil rights czar Patricia Derian questioned reports of brutality, torture, and murder, Christopher essentially blamed the brutality and murder on a handful of problem officers within the Junta. Before I left El Salvador in 1979, Christopher oversaw or supported policies and regimes that resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands of dissidents throughout Central and South America.

As distressed as I was that President Carter's civil rights policies were being perverted by Christopher (with or without Carter's knowledge), I couldn't discuss the policies without jeopardizing my top secret clearance or future employment with the LAPD. Evidence of Christopher’s complicity can be found in Weakness and Deceit: US Policy and El Salvador (Bonner 1984). It’s no surprise that Christopher and Carter’s autobiographies hardly mention their conduct in Central or South America - a possible sign of their consciousness of guilt.

After I transferred into the USMC Reserve in September 1979, I returned to India and married Malu. We moved into a small apartment in Van Nuys and I sold men’s clothing while learning how to fly helicopters and airplanes. Malati worked at a local bank.

Although I had already corresponded with the LAPD in 1978, the hiring process was no picnic. Affirmative action policies meant that male white candidates needed a minimum score of 96, while women and minorities could score in the low 70s. As a result of LA’s anti-white discrimination, some of the low-performance minorities only perpetuated stereotypes of inferiority that the rest of us were required to ignore – lest we suffer charges of intolerance and discrimination. When an entry-level board member asked why I wanted to join the LAPD, my unrehearsed reply was simple – “It’s all I’ve ever wanted to do.”

I’d been building my hours as a pilot and enjoyed ferrying parts and firefighter pilots between airports and remote landing strips during the summer of 1980. I was laid off in mid-September and, within the week received a call from the LAPD asking if I was ready to enter the October Class.

I entered the LAPD Academy on October 6, 1980 and marched my class on graduation day, February, Friday the 13th, 1981. I had heard that change was coming to the LAPD and wanted to be part of that change - the new LAPD.

The LAPD

During the next decade, I was assigned to Van Nuys, Southwest, West Valley, Pacific, and Foothill patrol divisions, working primarily in low-income neighborhoods throughout Los Angeles. During that time, I was also assigned to specialized details and loans that included vice, narcotics, and air support divisions. Although I enjoyed those assignments, it didn’t take long for me to get bored with the routine of those assignments. When offered a detective trainee position at Narcotics, I declined because of the monotony, unwarranted egos, and claustrophobic offices. At air support, I was surprised by the hectic boredom and monotony of circling, coordinating perimeters and pursuits, and the commute downtown. Although I thought that being an LAPD pilot was my ultimate goal, I soon discovered that I didn't want it as much as I once thought I did. Besides, I thrived in the challenge of the street’s random unpredictability. There was no intoxication like it.

Drugs, Politics, and Violence

Throughout the 1980s, general anesthetics like cocaine and phencyclidine (PCP) were the drugs of choice in the inner city. Both produce severe psychosis, especially after periods of sustained abuse. While LA’s gay scene frequented bath houses and huffed poppers and meth, frustrated black men and Latinos often escaped with crack and PCP. The white kids and affluent addicts mostly got high in the privacy of their own homes.

Despite media and political stereotypes, my partners and I were too busy to bother those who got high at home. But when neighbors called about the naked man who was assaulting speeding cars at a busy intersection, we had few alternatives - and more often than not, the man was black or brown. Naked black and brown suspects who assaulted cars in intersections were also more likely to attract the attention of crowds, media, and politicians.

In 1975, the LAPD reported (page 8) that officers had engaged in four million police-citizen contacts in 1973 alone. Of those contacts, suspects reported only 166 complaints of excessive force, or about one complaint in every 24,000 contacts. Of those complaints, none were attributed to “upper body” (carotid) control holds.

The LAPD also reported that from 1975-1982, eleven suspects died after LAPD officers used upper body holds to control them. Eight of the 11 were black and all were either heavy drug users or under the influence of drugs or alcohol when arrested. While medical experts later concluded that the demographically higher incidence of hypertension, heart disease, and sickle cell anemia could have contributed to the higher number of black deaths, those experts refused to admit that inner city blacks abused crack, PCP, and alcohol more often than suburban whites or other groups. And while cops and the community understood the stereotypical realities of dangerous drugs in the black community, the politicians who hated and feared LAPD’s independence used the statistically irrelevant and insignificant black mortality as proof of out-of-control cops and a racist LAPD.

Almost every day, I watched as LA’s Democrat politicians and complicit media exploited and promoted LA’s most corrupt and malleable black activists and politicians to push the mythology. Clowns like Maxine Waters, Merv Dymally and others were elected largely to blame the disastrous results of liberal-Democrat policy on white LA cops, while scam artists like Steve Yagman and Johnny Cochran enriched themselves by promoting the ugliest stereotypes.

Despite the fact that between 1975-1982 only eleven suspects died after applications of the upper-body control holds during the course of 30 million police-citizen contacts, anti-LAPD politicians and the media had grown weary of the LAPD’s willingness to investigate corrupt politicians and their sleazy friends. As a result, politicians like Zev Yaroslavsky twisted the LAPD’s remarkable achievement of restraint as a disaster and called for public hearings.

When Mayor Tom Bradley’s Police Commission and the courts threatened to take away the LAPD’s use of upper body control holds, LAPD physical training expert Ken Dionne correctly warned that the LAPD would have “no self-defense techniques available to adequately replace them” (Page 21). None of that mattered to the judges of the 9th Circuit, who eventually banned the use of upper body control holds by officers in 1983.

As a result, LAPD officers could no longer use the upper body control holds – which had reportedly caused zero injuries in 1974. Instead, officers were required to use the same applications of force that had caused the 166 recorded injuries that year. This decision made hardwood and metal batons the politician’s tool of choice for arresting violent suspects who, because of crack, PCP and alcohol, made black and brown men the most common recipient of injuries. And because the LAPD ranks were still comprised mostly of white men, we became the stereotypical deliverer of brutality to black men, and LA’s liberal Democrat politicians were only too happy to let us beat black men into submission.

Violent suspects who might’ve been safely rendered unconscious were now regularly beaten with the PR-24 (Monadnock) – modified metal pipes that were designed to break bones.

These devices are known as “pain-compliance devices,” which means that when an unintoxicated individual is struck, the pain will motivate him to stop resisting and cooperate with police officers. Unfortunately for those who are under the influence of general anesthetics like cocaine, PCP, and alcohol, batons and broken bones do little to dissuade violent suspects. As LA cops violently beat intoxicated suspects into submission, brutality lawsuits skyrocketed as multi-million dollar settlements were shared between the suspects and their lawyers, who often kicked back a portion of their receipts (through their trial lawyer associations) into the campaign coffers of the same liberal politicians who required cops to beat black men with metal pipes. In this way, LA politicians used the media and “community activists” to beat the LAPD into submission. Law firms like O’Melveny & Myers billed the city millions of dollars while kicking back profits to the politicians who hired them. Throughout the 1980s, politicians forced LA cops to routinely use excessive force, costing taxpayers $244 million in lawsuits in one year alone. Lawyers often kicked fees back to politicians who blamed the officers for being “out of control.”

The LAPD’s unconscionable “use of force” policy wasn’t the only challenge. As affirmative action gradually reduced the quality of patrol officers, training officers were often pressured to ignore incompetence and non-performance of some officers, based upon the existing racial quotas. LAPD’s background investigators were ordered to ignore minority candidates who maintained drug and gang affiliations. While some recruits lacked the finger-strength to fire their handguns, others struggled to read maps or write coherent reports.

But while the growing incompetence and declining morality challenged the mission and morale within the LAPD, LA’s politicians celebrated the LAPD’s “multicultural diversity,” profiting politically by the perception that the LAPD’s once professional ranks were being replaced by a fatter, lazier, and less professional cadre of security guards. Sloppy reports gave overworked prosecutors and the courts more excuses to dismiss good cases against LA’s most depraved predators, leaving Angelenos with more reasons to question the effectiveness of the LAPD.

Before 1991, LAPD recruiters managed long waiting lists from which to choose police candidates. But when the courts pressured LA politicians to change the hiring criteria, the waiting list was divided by lists of a) women, b) Latinos, c) blacks, and d) everyone else (e.g. white men). The City’s “Personnel Department” selected candidates from the top of each list. So while the top of the long male white and Latino lists comprised college graduates and experience military officers, the top of the shorter female and black lists were often comprised of candidates with lesser qualifications. The quotas also required that no one from the “White List” could enter the Academy unless the requisite number of blacks and females were also pushed through.

When the Academy washed out too many incompetent blacks and females, LA politicians finally relieved the Academy of its vetting responsibilities. Eventually, quotas required the LAPD to keep bad cops in favor of racial quotas, a reality that has been ignored even during the LAPD’s most sensational scandals.

Instead of improving race relations, affirmative action only perpetuated the perception of racial and gender inferiority. As the asymmetrical quotas pushed through larger numbers of marginal recruits, white cops were generally assumed to perform better because they had overcome the discriminatory obstacles that had been built against them, while less was expected from black and female candidates until proven otherwise – even when those black and female candidates would have qualified under competitive hiring practices.

Officers who voiced legitimate concerns faced counseling or worse for creating a “hostile work environment” while officers like Karen Tiffault shot and killed unarmed naked teens they could not physically control. Although politicians later claimed that Rampart was a multi-racial corruption problem, the accused white and Latino officers were later acquitted and received multi-million dollar judgments.

Throughout the 1980s, I expressed my growing concerns by writing a monthly column in the union monthly, Blue Line. In 1990, I transferred from patrol to motorcycle enforcement, where I was less likely to be assigned with lesser-qualified officers or be called to use force against LA’s intoxicated knuckleheads.

Despite my growing frustration with LA’s political forces, I had a great time putting career criminals away. As a regular subscriber to California’s case law (then called the Peace Officer’s Source Book), I often understood relevant changes in the law before my peers, supervisors, courts, prosecutors or defense attorneys. Because it took the LAPD a year or longer to update and distribute policy changes, I led roll call training segments so that my peers and supervisors also knew of the changes. After a few months, LAPD commanders stopped the practice because my training conflicted with the obsolete LAPD policies. Right or wrong, those policies stood until a new special order said otherwise.

From 1985-1989, I focused primarily on drug addicts – not because I liked to pick on the “non-violent victims of addiction” but because my quarry was responsible for a billion dollars in property crimes each year. Instead of driving around looking for a broken window or waiting for a shoplifter call, my partners and I hung around known drug dens where addicts regularly traded their loot for drugs and a place to rest. By staking out these dens, burglars and robbers came to me. And since these hard core addicts required constant doses of cocaine and heroin to avoid withdrawal, they were usually under the influence when I stopped them.

During those four years, my partners and I arrested more than 2700 addicts. Almost all of them boasted long criminal rap sheets, mostly for burglary, robbery, shoplift, and other assorted property crimes. Their subsequent incarceration effectively prevented nearly $300 million in crime, property loss, and productivity to LA residents and businesses.

Unfortunately for LA residents today, many courts and politicians (like LAPD Chief William Bratton) looked at those strategies as a waste of time and resources. What were originally three-page reports and a urine sample that took an hour to write eventually became a five hour investigation and almost twenty pages of redundant and wholly unnecessary paperwork. By complicating the investigations with unnecessary reports and tedious examinations, the courts and prosecutors succeeded in making arrests so difficult that officers could only arrest one or two felons at a time - as opposed to the 4-5 I routinely arrested each day during a shift.

These policy changes not only reduced the number of suspects that officers could arrest, but also reduced statistics in a way that could be interpreted as a reduction of crime - an invaluable talking point that is used by politically-savvy police chiefs to market someone like Antonio Villaraigosa for state or national office.

So instead of facilitating the way officers can effectively reduce crime, LA cops use their lights and sirens more often so that leaves Angelinos with the impression that dedicated professionals are doing their jobs. At the same time, Sheriff Lee Baca releases LA’s non-violent predators and addicts. Perception is everything.

Rodney King

On March 3, 1991, video technology caught up with LAPD policy and millions of people around the world saw what LA’s politicians required their cops to do. Having been assigned to LAPD’s Foothill Division until 1990, I knew almost everyone at the scene.

When I first saw the video, I sensed that the officers had used excessive force. But when I slowed the video and reexamined LAPD policy, I sensed that the officers involved had followed policy and had probably saved Rodney King’s life by relieving CHP rookie Melanie Singer of her responsibility to arrest him.

When politicians like Zev Yaroslavsky and Bradley demanded indictments, I noted the hypocrisy of politicians who, after mandating police brutality since 1983, now demanded LAPD heads to roll.

After sending a short letter to the editor, the Daily News asked me to prepare an op-ed. My wife was concerned but I replied, “What are they going to do, fire me for exercising my Constitutional rights?”

While I knew LA politicians were sleazy, it never occurred to me that they would openly retaliate – nor did I know that my old friend from El Salvador, Warren Christopher, was now Mayor Bradley’s attorney and personal friend.

Two weeks after Rodney King’s arrest, I wrote of police brutality in ways that contradicted the LAPD and Mayor Bradley’s official position. To Bradley and his handpicked police commissioners, the idea that policymakers could be named as co-defendants apparently went too far.

As Mayor Bradley’s personal friend and appointed investigator, Warren Christopher’s role was to blame a handful of the LAPD’s “problem officers” just as he had blamed the “problem officers” of Latin America’s military juntas during the 1970s.

I transferred to Valley Traffic Division in May 1991 and was almost immediately targeted by a sergeant I’d never met before. Known as a squirrel by officers and detectives alike, LAPD Sergeant Jerry Nicholson was quick to complain even about my meritorious work. For about six weeks, Nicholson showed up unexpectedly and it was apparent that he was trying to find dirt. After several audits and surveys he found nothing.

Jaywalker

That changed when a 22-year-old illegal alien jaywalked across the six lanes of Roscoe Blvd during rush hour. Several pedestrians had been killed and traffic officers had been requested to enforce pedestrian violations.

The stop was ordinary. While issuing the ticket, I conversed with Thomas Chavez in Spanish to ease his anxiety. When he identified El Salvador as his home, I shared some generic experiences there.

When I completed the citation, Chavez asked to read it. After blankly staring at the ticket, I translated the ticket line by line. After explaining that he had to sign or would go to jail, Olortegui began to walk away. I grabbed his wrist and, when he resisted, I wrestled him into custody using a minimal amount of force, leaving him uninjured.

During the scuffle, a motorist stopped and asked if I needed help. Chavez was handcuffed and, as physical arrests go, this was a comparatively insignificant incident. I called for a supervisor and Jerry Nicholson took the call.

When he arrived, Nicholson immediately treated me like a suspect and initiated a criminal complaint.

A few weeks later, the LAPD’s Internal Affairs Division closed the case due to a lack of evidence and injury. But when the Los Angeles Daily News published more of my politically-charged missives, the case was re-opened and Deputy City Attorney Alice Hand filed criminal charges.

Unknown to me at the time, Alice Hand routinely charged men with assault and domestic violence charges when no evidence existed. Hand used her position to threaten men with prison if they refused to complete psychological counseling, called “diversion.” When her victims completed the unnecessary counseling she would drop the charges and, without a single trial, take credit for a successful prosecution. In this way, corrupt prosecutors like Hand, David Sotelo, and Mike Nifong inflated their records to improve their political profile for elections by bragging about their “100% conviction rate.”

Taking down a “bad white male cop” along the way would improve her chances even more, especially after Rodney King. A few years later, the Los Angeles Public Defender’s Office accused Hand of victimizing more than 100 innocent men by ordering them to "therapy." I was one of them, although I refused.

Nevertheless, I was arraigned in February 1992 during my shift. I rode my police motorcycle to the court on Beauchet Street. When my name was called, I approached the bench, armed and in uniform, with the eyes of the crowded courtroom on me. I promised the judge not to assault illegal aliens and returned to work. (That judge and I are now good friends).

The Riots

On April 29, 1992, the Rodney King defendants were acquitted not because they had not used excessive force, but because they had followed the LAPD’s brutal and misguided policies – just as I had suggested a year earlier.

An apoplectic Mayor Bradley, whose own lawyer headed up the independent blue-ribbon Christopher Commission that blamed 44 "problem officers" of brutality, told rioters that they “had a right to be angry and had a right to express (their) anger.” My motor squad watched his comments on live TV – someone eventually washed all record of that statement.

Despite my continued status as a criminal-defendant, I accompanied my motor squad to protect City Hall from rioters.

Standing in the glow of the sunset, I listened for the distant riot and surveyed the street. Except for a tipped kiosk, there was little evidence that they’d been there and I was a little disappointed. If they had known of my willingness to give them unrestricted access into City Hall, I might have escorted the rioters into the Mayor’s Office myself.

When a CNN cameraman panned me and my squad, I smiled at the irony of being dared to use force against rioters who the Mayor had earlier encouraged to riot. Going through the motions could not have been easier. I mentioned this to my squad leader, Al Zardeneta, and he smiled and said, "do the best you can."

After a few meaningless baton-rattling shows of force near 2nd and Broadway, we rode to 54th and Van Ness, passing fully engulfed gas stations and mini-malls along the way. We hung around the bus station while the LAPD allowed rioters sufficient time to express their outrage, as recommended by Bradley. (Politicians and the media blamed Chief Gates for being in Santa Barbara a day after refusing to fund preparations a day earlier).

When we were finally deployed along Western Avenue in the early morning hours, we warmed ourselves in the glow of the strip malls and liquor stores. The riots burned all night and through the next day. Except for a few nightly curfew sweeps, we snoozed through much of it.

Because Democrats had enjoyed exclusive control in LA since the 1950s, I wondered why any LA cop would get between the voters, rioters, and the politicians they elected. Most LA cops lived outside of the city in conservative neighborhoods uncorrupted by liberal politics. To most cops, riots are good for their economy.

The public should also know that when the LAPD and LAFD union representatives (and Chief Bratton) push Democrat candidates and their liberal policies, the endorsements are purely political. As the political wing of the Mayor’s Office, the union reps know better than to fight LA’s Democrat stranglehold. Any honest opposition risks the pay raises and funding that comes with lying about corrupt political candidates – and just like public school teachers whose kids attend private schools, LA cops enjoy the financial benefits far from the communities that our unions mislead and financially bludgeon.

Don’t misunderstand me. I’m not saying that good public servants don’t exist or deserve a generous income. The problem is that the LAPD, as a law enforcement agency, is no longer in the business of protecting and serving. Except for individual officers who take their oath of office seriously, the LAPD exists to reflect LA’s demographics and to promote Democrat Party candidates and their misguided liberal ideas.

If one can imagine the Lakers, Dodgers, and LA Philharmonic hiring candidates based upon racial, gender, and sexual orientation quotas, you’ll get an idea of where your LAPD tax dollars have been going since 1991.

LAPD Trial Board

The riots eventually died down and, two months later, an LAPD trial board convened to hear the evidence against me. After a long day of sworn and recorded testimony, the Board acquitted me of all charges, attacking Sergeant Nicholson for his sloppy investigation and my alleged accuser of “being, at best, a liar.”

After being cleared, I filed a complaint against the Los Angeles City Attorney, who transferred the case to the DA’s Office. Deputy District Attorney David Sotelo was eager to take over.

After years as a marine and LA cop, it was easy to recognize the La Raza Anglophobe for what he was. Marked by what is known as “little man’s syndrome,” Sotelo graduated from one of America’s most leftist universities, and joined the DA’s Special Investigations Division specifically to target white LAPD officers. Since the LAPD had officially dismissed all charges against me, his actions as prosecutor were purely political. I remained on duty throughout the trial and, although I successfully impeached every witness against him, Sotelo essentially blamed me for the Rodney King beating during his closing argument.

Judge Veronica McBeth, a light-skinned black prosecutor known at the City Attorney’s Office as “The Princess” was only too pleased to ignore Sotelo’s attack. After agreeing with Sotelo to prevent any mention of the LAPD’s official hearing, McBeth was satisfied to hear Sotelo’s attack. Except for Sergeant Nicholson, I was the only white male in the downtown courtroom.

Convicted

I was dazed. After ordering the removal of my firearm in the courtroom, Sotelo gloated, telling reporters that the DA’s Office was serious about getting rid of "bad cops."

This is how the darkest and most rewarding period of my life began. By Christmas Eve, I was unemployed and struggling to find work. Despite my 13 years of experience, I was not surprised that no one wanted to hire an ex-cop who was convicted of assaulting a jaywalker. I sent more than 100 unanswered resumes and worked jobs as a studio extra (Diagnosis Murder $40/day).

The best job I found was working as an unarmed security guard for $10/hour, but that job ended a few weeks later when the Northridge earthquake damaged the Sherman Oaks Fashion Square.

When fellow motor officer Wayne Dean rode his police motorcycle off the collapsed Newhall Pass Interchange, I envied his tragic death. After all, he was worth more dead than I was alive. Had I been killed like Dean, at least my family and children would be financially secure.

When my unemployment claim was rejected (the LAPD argued that my conviction was misconduct) I was forced to appeal. My life was in turmoil, credit cards maxed, car falling apart, mortgage late, and my family life very stressed.

I finally found work by taking care of an adult autistic man. Loren lived with his mother and was completely out of control, physically dangerous and unpredictable. Loren lived on a three-month cycle that began with an erratic diet, interruption of meds, insomnia, anxiety and tantrums that eventually prompted his mother to call the white coats. For the next month, Loren was physically restrained and drugged until, about a month later, he returned home in a dazed stupor to begin the cycle again.

I told his mother that, for Loren’s $500/week disability payment, I would live with, train, manage, and habilitate Loren 24/7. She accepted and I was not only able to keep my family afloat but, within months, Loren was disciplined enough to manage his own affairs and live in an assisted living community. Not only that, Loren learned how to care for himself, lost much of his excess weight, ran 5 miles AND bicycled 10 miles each day.

My success with Loren generated excitement with other families who asked if I could create programs for their own autistic children. Without knowing, I had developed a successful model that could have helped thousands of autistic adults achieve independence and happier and healthier lives. My financial prospects improved and it soon appeared that my program would eventually generate more income than I had as an LA cop!

In May 1994, the Appellate Division of the Superior Court reversed my conviction, citing David Sotelo for prosecutorial misconduct and Judge Veronica McBeth for judicial misconduct. Another court cited the LAPD for wrongful termination and I was cleared of all charges. After McBeth, Hand and Sotelo were removed from the case, the courts and prosecutors refused to refile the charges.

Sergeant Jerry Nicholson and Deputy DA Sotelo were both promoted – Nicholson to lieutenant and, unlike Mike Nifong, Sotelo was appointed as a superior court judge. Judge Sotelo was later found guilty of permitting a prosecutor to intimidate defense witnesses, a felony. It's unclear how many of Sotelo's other victims have not appealed his behavior.

I returned to the LAPD in July (1994) and, during the next six years, led several innovative projects that included video enforcement and what became part of the LAPD’s first website. I worked as a “complaint officer” (similar to the LAPD’s “Senior Lead Officer”), acting as liaison between LA’s political offices and the LAPD. I also participated in several traffic safety reports about traffic enforcement, senior drivers, and school zones. Much credit goes to then-Captain Alan Kerstein, who took my recommendations serious and supported my ideas. Our combined efforts resulted in the LAPD's first dividion-wide Meritorious Unit Citation. I later ghost-wrote an article about innovative traffic ideas for Chief Bernard Parks.

Although I had arrested thousands of career criminals, junkies, felons, and drunks before 1994, I successfully avoided criminal suspects and arrested no one between 1992 until I retired in 2000. Warren Christopher would have been very proud of my spotless complaint record. I figured that if jurors, prosecutors, judges, politicians, and my police department refused to support my efforts that arresting predators was pointless. As far as I was concerned, LA’s residents would get the gangs, crime, and declining quality of life that they deserved.

So I went through the motions. My uniform and motorcycle were spotless. I kissed babies, smiled, waved, and became the model of the new LAPD – an all-American patriot who did everything except the job he was sworn to do. As an LA cop, I became little more than an attractive, well-paid lie.

Almost twenty years to the day after I joined the LAPD, I retired.

43 and Retired

On June 6, 1966, I was eight years old. While doing some homework I wrote the date 6-6-66. The numbers intrigued me and, within a few months, I calculated that on 7-7-77 I would be in the Marine Corps (I was in El Salvador); on 8-8-88 I’d be an LA cop (I worked a footbeat in Pacoima that day) and on 9-9-99 I’d be a year from retirement (I was). Although I had neatly mapped and achieved my timeline and objectives, I had no vision after 2000.

Although my marriage to Malati had collapsed in 1994, I met another woman who became the love of my life. She was smart, attractive, successful, and playful. I was still angry about my experience but she supported in ways that I can never repay.

Because of my experience with retaliation and corruption, I convinced her to protect her assets in a way that, if I was ever targeted by someone like Warren Christopher again, I would never again expose my loved ones to the liability I incurred. We never married and I signed away all future claims against her. In this way, I legally own nothing except my generous LAPD pension – which cannot be touched by courts or plaintiffs. I learned that there are worse things than death and that cash isn’t one of them. As a private investigator, such protection makes my job easier.

Coincidentally, I took my investigator test in 1997 on the same day that two suspects decided to commit one of the most notorious bank robberies in US history. At the time, I lived in Laurel Canyon and spent my days working on Laurel Canyon Blvd. If I hadn’t taken that test I would’ve been one of the first officers at the scene. As it turned out, many of my friends and partners were involved – some were injured. Although I was initially disappointed to have missed the excitement, I now figure that my response would have probably resulted in the day’s only LAPD fatality: and the last thing I would have wanted was to have LAPD Chief Parks and Mayor Hahn posturing as politicians who care for their dead cops. It simply wasn’t my time.

Although I enjoy retirement more than I can say, I have never been busier. I have enjoyed friends, family, travel, diving, flying, photography, protests, and parties. Most importantly, I enjoy preying on predators.

With advances in Internet technology, finding work as a PI was as easy as building a website and advertising on Google. When I want work, I simply modify my Google or Yahoo ad campaign to become the #1 search response and wait by the phone. Once I have a few cases and PayPal deposits, (many clients were from outside of the US) I would shut down the ad and do the work – usually from my computer at home.

When I must leave the house, I am sometimes accompanied by a few of my customer service reps.

Since May 2008, I have been engaged in the most important case of my career. As the investigation continues I am more and more convinced that this will be the last case of my career. I’m not sure where it will lead but I only know that doing nothing would make me miserable. I have no moral choice and, with support from my family and friends, I will focus on it as long as it takes.

In his book Happiness is a Serious Problem, Dennis Prager writes that if you seek happiness you will never find it – but if you do things that are spiritually fulfilling, lasting happiness is often the unavoidable result. Having attended as many funerals as I have, I also recognize that death is never as tragic as not ever having lived. If I have accomplished nothing else in my life, I have lived.

As I approach my 52nd birthday, I can say that I have never been more spiritually fulfilled or happier. I wish the same for my readers.

Tagometer